|
$Pork not fishThe RecordThere are
many people who believe government agencies exist for
the ‘greater good’. For such people the men and
women in agencies like the EPA have one thing in mind
– what is best for the entire Hudson River and
future generations. The truth is, Virginia, those men
and women are simply bureaucrats. If they are told to
dredge, they dredge. If they are told not to dredge,
they won’t lose a tear. Why not
consider some recent reports and facts before we assume
that government agencies exist for the ‘greater
good’? ·
County
Executive pays no-show jobs. ·
Mayor’s
brother takes HUD money to buy house. ·
Connected
lawyer, Exner, steals from the OTB parlors he is hired
to run. ·
Connected
ex-barber gets a $250,000 job and gives his brother a
$75,000 job in a political patronage front organization
operating as a ‘non-profit corporation’. ·
Civil
Service rules are ignored to hire relatives as Police
Officers. The EPA
spent hundreds of millions of dollars on the Love Canal.
But all the pollutants are still there! What happened to
the money? Who’s greater good was served? No,
Virginia, this is a story about $pork – not fish. The
fact is even after the half a billion dollar dredging
effort, PCB levels in fish will still not meet EPA’s
own safety standards.
Those who want to eat the fish will have to wait
decades for nature to cover the pollutants. Irrespective
of such facts, Virginia, isn’t it quite arrogant for
some to divine the greater good of others? Communities
in the Lower Hudson and elsewhere are either not
exposed, or exposed to a much lesser degree. The people
in Chicago or Miami are not at all affected by Upper
Hudson river PCBs. Is it good for San Francisco
residents when the EPA does to Ft. Edward residents what
Ft. Edward residents don’t want done to themselves? PCBs are
concentrated in the Upper Hudson. The people living in
the Upper Hudson are the ones most exposed to PCBs.
Those people don’t want the EPA to mess with the PCBs
in the river. Why? Are they ill informed? Are they
incapable of reason? Are they self-destructive? Or could
they actually know what is good for them, and what is
not?
|